Map the project
Resources, infrastructure, suppliers, markets, permits, economics and dependencies.
Project design · intelligence · acceleration
Find the signal.
Build the leverage.
I map complex projects, diagnose where value or risk is hiding, and build the models, adapters and decision tools that make it visible.
Project mapsTelemetry & market dataOperating modelsManagement tools
Project intelligenceTT / 01
Map
diagnose
build
diagnose
build
01 / Position
Complex projects rarely lack information. They lack a useful view.
I connect the commercial, technical and operational system, then go into the data, code or workflow where leverage is hiding.
Why now
AI and modern software make it possible to build project-specific intelligence at a fraction of the previous cost. The point is not to “add AI”; it is to turn fragmented evidence into a clearer decision.
01 / MAP
See the whole project.
02 / DIAGNOSE
Find the decisive constraint.
03 / BUILD
Make the next decision easier.
02 / Capability
Turn fragmented project information into usable intelligence.
Start with the hard live question, understand the system around it, and build the smallest useful model, adapter or decision tool.
Connect and rebuild the signal
Documents, telemetry, market data and commitments, plus the drivers, APIs and adapters needed to make the underlying signal reliable.
Turn signal into action
Models, visualisations, custom tools, action graphs and workflows built around live management decisions.
Not another dashboard.
A project-specific combination of data flows, AI, deterministic code and custom tools, grounded in operating context and built around a decision.EvidenceDocuments · telemetry · market data
ConnectionsDrivers · APIs · adapters
ReasoningAI breadth · deterministic logic
SignalThe useful perspective
ActionThe next decision
03 / Method
Build in small, provable increments; high value first.
Understand the system. Isolate the leverage. Build enough to test it. Expand when the work proves useful.
01
Understand
Learn the project, its operating context and the hard live question.
02
Isolate
Find the constraint, missing connection or unreliable signal controlling the decision.
03
Build
Create the smallest useful model, adapter, visualisation or working tool.
04
Prove
Put it in use, test whether it improves the decision, and expand only when it earns its place.
04 / Working proof
EnergyForge: from site to decision-ready model.
An open energy-modelling and simulation platform that automates site targeting and turns real-world energy sites into decision-ready digital twins.
01 / Target & segment
Find and measure the site
Automate prospect targeting; collate local grid and market context; segment usable areas and estimate capacity.
02 / Build the twin
Connect the system
Link site geometry, generation, storage, load, grid and market components in a configurable graph model.
03 / Test the case
Compare what could work
Run scenarios, backtest assumptions and monitor market and operating performance as the project develops.
Target & segmentSite geometry, capacity surfaces, grid proximity and local market context.
Build the twinA configurable graph connecting the physical and commercial system.
Test the caseScenario modelling, backtesting and performance monitoring.
Second working exemplar
Mining project assessment
Greek Ni Exploration Project: feasibility support from evidence to decision.
A decision framework for early-stage project assessment. It combines project records, public data, spatial models and design criteria in one working document. Management and technical teams can see what is known, what is inferred, what remains missing and which work should be done next.
01 / IntegratePrivate project records and national data services
02 / ModelScripted GIS and interactive 3D terrain and geology views
03 / TestTechnical and economic design criteria
04 / DecideEvidence gaps, work priorities and next decisions
Connect the evidencePrivate project data with national geological, cadastral and environmental services.
Inspect the settingScripted terrain and geology views for testing spatial relationships.
Screen the project caseCurated technical, process, grade, energy and market criteria.
Keep the evidence traceableProject records, interpretations, data gaps and source notes in one technical account.
Supports project screening, work-program design and feasibility planning. Formal resource estimation, engineering design and independent feasibility work remain separate governed workstreams.
Next exemplar
Supplier performance
Compare solar telemetry with supplier commitments, separate meaningful divergence from noise, and identify where management should investigate or act.
05 / Experience
Experience across multiple primary industries and across the whole project system.
Finance · 10 yearsCommercial, investment and modelling foundation
Mining & energy · 10 yearsRioZim · Pan African · Raintree · Speriam
Independent projectsProject development, exploration and resource investments
H2E · ItalyModular electrolyser manufacturing
Where I fit
Cross-functional projects where commercial, technical and operating questions are entangled; important signal is fragmented; or the team needs to move from research to a decision.
Based in Italy. Working globally.
06 / Conversation
Start with the right first question.
A bounded, high-value question. Small enough to move quickly, useful enough to prove its value, and capable of expanding if the fit is strong.
Start small. Prove what matters.
The first step might be a diagnostic, model or working prototype. Let the evidence shape what comes next.
For the right project, I’m prepared to take the first bounded piece of work on spec.
Send me the live question →troy@travlos.net